fraserrg

Had my 35 tfsi S-Tronic a few weeks now. Done 340 miles and getting 32-35 in town driving in eco. Had expected more if I’m honest

Both come with S-Line. Would like NAV which can come with both. Seems like the 1.8 is the more popular one by the looks of things

HI chris, Unfortunately not as I'm only 20 I cant test drive.... bit of a pain. Could always get my old man to come with me and try them out. I currently drive a fiesta - heres the fiesta stats compared to the audi stats. Fiesta 1L 140ps zetec Power 138 bhp Top Speed 125 mph 0-60 mph 8.7 secs Torque 210 Nm, 155 ft-lb CO2 Emissions 104 g/km Euro Emissions Standard 6 Miles Per Tank 572 miles Insurance Group 18 1.8TFSI Power 177 bhp Top Speed 149 mph 0-60 mph 6.7 secs Torque 250 Nm, 184 ft-lb CO2 Emissions 138 g/km Euro Emissions Standard 6 Miles Per Tank 517 miles Insurance Group 33 2.0 TFSI Power 226 bhp Top Speed 155 mph 0-60 mph 5.8 secs Torque 370 Nm, 273 ft-lb CO2 Emissions 141 g/km Euro Emissions Standard 6 Miles Per Tank 505 miles Insurance Group 36

I said i didn't care about top speed as Im never going to go near that. Only thing putting me off the 1.8 as its only 37bhp more than current car just doesnt seem like much of an upgrade

Hi all, I am looking to buy a new car. Very interested in the audi TT and would like some opinions. As im only 20 the insurance is relatively high. The 2.0 tfsi is coming in around 1600 without a black box (WILL NOT GO NEAR ONE) whereas the 1.8 version thats 0.9 seconds slower and has like 10mph less top speed (dont really care about top speed) is coming in at £1260. So the question is: is it worth the extra money for the sake of 0.9 seconds quicker 0-60? Does the car transform with that extra torque and HP? Let me know. Thanks alo