Jump to content


jdragon

Established Member
  • Posts

    337
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

Posts posted by jdragon

  1. It's insane! I'd take the CAGA lump from my A4 in the A5 any day 😀

    My driving pattern is optimum, but what's not clear to me now is how much benefit the Archoil and will have on keeping the recirculation system in a better state, to prolong the life of the cooler once it has been changed.

    Having to change it again after another 70k miles wouldn't be the end of the world, but it's far from ideal.

     

  2. I didn't know there are two. Have just looked through the workshop manual:

    Exhaust gas recirculation valve 1 -GX5- (high pressure side) V339

    - Exhaust gas recirculation valve 2 -GX6- (low pressure side) V338

    Might have to see what they say about cleaning the V339 😃

    The garage is very good; founded by master techs, and they will work with you to get the right solution. The Audi dealership up the road from them has been known to send in cars when they are over capacity.

    I've tried, as always, to be pragmatic with this fault but as I said in another post; sometimes there are things best left to the pros 😎

  3. 15 minutes ago, Stevey Y said:

    Hi I think I have found your problem, spoken to a rather drunk Audi tech last night who explained that its probably the EGR cooler beginning to block up as that will make the ECU think its the DPF blocking, the cooler can be found hanging out of the back of the DPF under the turbo, Audi issued a TSB to the dealers about this a while ago as it was becoming a frequent problem.

    Hi Steve, thank you for considering this, and for the feedback.

    Was is TPI_2050077-7 posted on Apr 27th? I enquired about the EGR cooler with a VAG specialist I've taken the cars to for around 8 years (to get a feel for the "what if") and they said it's a 6 hour job totaling ~£900 with a new EGR valve and cooler assembly.

    Cleaning is a possibility but they didn't recommend it because most of the cost is labour.

    They also recommended changing the sensors for the reasons you suggested, as the overall cost is insignificant. And the quality of AdBlue can attribute to this greatly.

    Definitely not on the same level as the A4 ha. It wouldn't be my luck for it to come down to the sensor.

    I had the MIL come on the dash, so I've raised it with the warranty company and will see how it goes.

    Given these engines can do in excess of 300k if serviced, the recirculation system is a disaster.

    • Like 1
  4. Car is running fine (perhaps MPGs have dropped a little) but the P2002 00 fault code keeps coming back.

    After some more research it would seem I've missed a potential (G450 EGR or G451 DPF) sensor issue. These are usually indicated by the relevant fault code, but not always.

    I measured as follows from cold start:

    Engine off:

    IDE07084 Differential pressure ratio: low-pressure EGR 0.0 kg/h
    IDE07086 Exhaust mass flow of low-pressure EGR: calculated 1.317
    IDE07378 Exhaust flap actuator 1: B1: inlet pressure - specified value 1006.0 hPa
    IDE07385 Exhaust flap actuator 1: B1: inlet pressure - actual value calculated 1006.0 hPa
    IDE07744 Particle filter: air pressure sensor 1 bank 1: raw value 0 hPa
    IDE07745 Particl.filt.: different.press.sensor 1 bank 1: adaptat. value 1 hPa
    IDE07747 Par.fil: diff.pr.sens.1 bank 1: offset 0 hPa
    IDE07750 Exhaust recirculat.2: different.press.sens.1 bank 1: raw value -4.2 hPa
    IDE07751 Exh.recircul. 2: differential pres.sensor 1 bank 1: adap. value -2.8 hPa
    IDE07754 Exhaust recirculation valve 1 bank 1: activation 0.00 %
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Idle:

    IDE07084 Differential pressure ratio: low-pressure EGR 3.6 kg/h
    IDE07086 Exhaust mass flow of low-pressure EGR: calculated 1.317
    IDE07378 Exhaust flap actuator 1: B1: inlet pressure - specified value 1013.3 hPa
    IDE07385 Exhaust flap actuator 1: B1: inlet pressure - actual value calculated 1013.3 hPa
    IDE07744 Particle filter: air pressure sensor 1 bank 1: raw value 12 hPa
    IDE07745 Particl.filt.: different.press.sensor 1 bank 1: adaptat. value 12 hPa
    IDE07747 Par.fil: diff.pr.sens.1 bank 1: offset 0 hPa
    IDE07750 Exhaust recirculat.2: different.press.sens.1 bank 1: raw value 6.7 hPa
    IDE07751 Exh.recircul. 2: differential pres.sensor 1 bank 1: adap. value 8.1 hPa
    IDE07754 Exhaust recirculation valve 1 bank 1: activation -9.04 %
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ~2000 RPM:

    IDE07084 Differential pressure ratio: low-pressure EGR 16.2 kg/h
    IDE07086 Exhaust mass flow of low-pressure EGR: calculated 1.317
    IDE07378 Exhaust flap actuator 1: B1: inlet pressure - specified value 1032.3 hPa
    IDE07385 Exhaust flap actuator 1: B1: inlet pressure - actual value calculated 1032.3 hPa
    IDE07744 Particle filter: air pressure sensor 1 bank 1: raw value 26 hPa
    IDE07745 Particl.filt.: different.press.sensor 1 bank 1: adaptat. value 26 hPa
    IDE07747 Par.fil: diff.pr.sens.1 bank 1: offset 0 hPa
    IDE07750 Exhaust recirculat.2: different.press.sens.1 bank 1: raw value 30.1 hPa
    IDE07751 Exh.recircul. 2: differential pres.sensor 1 bank 1: adap. value 31.4 hPa
    IDE07754 Exhaust recirculation valve 1 bank 1: activation -11.28 %

    IDE07750 and IDE07751 went up to ~50 hPa at the same RPM if that has any relevance
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The behaviour appears to be typical i.e. the pressure increases with RPM.

    I've probably measured some useless bocks there too 😄

    From what I have understand, the DPF sensor offset value shouldn't be 0 hPa, is that correct?

  5. Here's a few more tweaks confirmed working:

    --------------------------------
    Comfort Blinking:
    [46-Central Module] > [Adaptation-10] > Turn Signal Control > Freeway Flashing Cycles > Current Value: 3 > New Value: 5 (1-5 possible)
    --------------------------------
    Increase time required to open boot with remote:
    [46 - Central Convenience] > [Adaptation - 10] > IDE08400-Actuation time to open rear lid with remote control > Current Value: 800 (ms) > New Value: 2000 > Do it
    --------------------------------
    Windows Open/Close with Fob:
    [46-Cent. Conv] > [Coding] > [Long Coding Helper] > Allow Experimental Data > Byte 12 > Bit 0 = Comfort_operation > active
    --------------------------------

  6. Here's the data from the night before I used the Cataclean:

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Monday,25,April,2022,20:06:45
    Mileage: 114587km-71201miiles

      IDE00430-ENG57549   Particle filter: field regeneration request status-Bits 0-7 0 
      IDE00432   Particle filter: time since last regeneration 5.650 H
      IDE00434   Particle filter: soot mass calculated 22.12 g
      IDE00435   Particle filter: soot mass measured 5.39 g
      IDE00436   Particle filter: kilometers since last regeneration 395.1 km
      IDE06059   Particulate filter: oil ash mass 27.4953320 g
      IDE06060   Particulate filter ash load limit 80.000 g

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    I drove to work in 5th gear so the revs were at around 2000rpm

    There are several corners and roundabouts within 0.5 mile of leaving work before I get onto the the A road. I instantly noticed the car was much smoother accelerating cold, so much that I forgot to stop and fill up on my way home 😄

    Measured values after driving 86 miles with cataclean in 1/4 tank:

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Tuesday,26,April,2022,18:25:59
    Mileage: 114725km-71287miiles

      IDE00430-ENG57549   Particle filter: field regeneration request status-Bits 0-7 0 
      IDE00432   Particle filter: time since last regeneration 1.049 H
      IDE00434   Particle filter: soot mass calculated 7.55 g
      IDE00435   Particle filter: soot mass measured -2.93 g
      IDE00436   Particle filter: kilometers since last regeneration 64.4 km
      IDE06059   Particulate filter: oil ash mass 27.5283779 g
      IDE06060   Particulate filter ash load limit 80.000 g

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Looking at the mileage, the car did a regen shortly after starting my drive home, so not stopping wasn't a bad thing in the end.

    The soot values are slightly less than when I measure after the last regen, but the last regen was done at idle, and I had done an additional 25 miles before I read the values posted Apr 20, so I cannot say for sure if the soot values were reduced more. The best I could do is check after another 25 miles to see how the values compare.

    However, I assume with the cataclean running through whilst the regen was being done, it would yield the best possible outcome in terms of cleaning?

×
×
  • Create New...

Forums


News


Membership